It appears that yet again Nancy at Chilled White Whine has been attacked. This time I fear it could be one of our own. Nancy may have deleted these comments, and I understand if she has.

If you are going to make accusations, you should first be sure to read the evidence you have collected, and take it a step further if you can by collecting a bit more evidence.

So many people are here to help you in the Kimkins case.

I have been accused again of things that are not true. It’s not a matter of my feeling getting hurt but more a matter of the spread of misinformation that will slow things down.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again. I have absolutely no anger against anyone who is really doing what they can to help the cause.

Just because there may be a letter on here showing an interaction I had with someone, there is nothing illegal in that letter and the end result of that letter actually was a good thing. It resulted in a disclaimer being added to Amy of Eatinglow’s website that she does not endorse Kimkins – and upon my just visiting her site it appears she no longer needs it as she has edited the video! Bravo Amy!

I sincerely appreciate that Amy. I do know what a pain in the behind that kind of work can be and how time consuming it is. I’ll be sending Amy a personal letter of gratitude for her efforts, and a thank you for stopping by LCF the other day. In addition, I will unpublish the letters I wrote to her.

How’s that anonymous?

Now if you would like to lump me in with people who’s “behaviour is essentially tampering with witnesses and evidence in the suit against Heidi Diaz.” then please tell me what it is that I have done exactly so I can stop doing it. I have never tampered with evidence or witnesses, I have stated opinions perhaps, but your claims are unfounded.

You on the other hand anonymous are a big problem. You need to address those who you have a problem with. You need to learn to stand up for what is right. You need to stop spreading information that is incorrect – and I have a really good question for you, but it will be addressed on another blog. YOU from what I currently understand know some information based on your post of something that happened before it happened. YOU now concern me.

I have screen shots as well as video of your comment left on Nancy’s blog. I will not use them unless I need to. Leave Nancy out of this you coward. Come over here and tell me what you really think. I dare you.