Banned Camp Open for New Applicants and the Peabody Fan Club
Hello Campers!
The Kimkins Banned Camp is now accepting new applicants for the 2009 summer season. Welcome our newest member DeLynn! How can you become a member of this elite camp facility?
Simply join Kimkins.com, then join the Facebook group Kimkins Sucks, and just wait until you are unable to log into the Kimkins site. It’s that easy! There is no additional charge to join Banned Camp. While you will need to invest to join Kimkins, you might get those funds back if you made your investment during the time of the Womans World release.
If you’d like to be a special member of the Peabody fan club, you’ll be required to do a bit more work. You’ll need to join Kimkins, become a banned camp member, and then start your very own blog to spread the truth of your story and what you experience. You must take an oath to blog the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Peabody seems to be a bit selective on who he allows into his club, but once you’re in, you too could recieve a personal autographed letter from him where he requests your name and address. I’m not sure, but I think he is planning suprise live visits to members of his fan club! (please note, I do not know for sure if this is his intention, I am only imagining this.)
One more event you should all be aware of – This Monday June 8th we hope to see some more entertaining paperwork created that will be published by the Riverside Court House on the current state of Kimkins, our lawsuit, and hopefully more scheduling of the events to come. Yipee!
Looks like we will have plenty of scary stories to share around the campfire this summer. I’m off to pack my things now.
Can’t wait to see you all there!
Share this Post[?]
Email Address May Tip You Off To A Scam or Phishing
Do you use a free email address or one that is associated with mass emailing services? What can that do to your business?
I recently had a member who had received an email, his name has been removed to protect his identity. Here is how it read:
Attn:(insert name here)
I am the personal/sole executor to the late Mr.Robert Schroeter hereinafter referred to as my client who worked as an independent oil magnate in my country.He died in a car crash with his immediate family in East London on November 5, 2002..
Mr Robert had Left behind a deposit of 6.8 Million British Pounds Sterling only with a trust company After his death,the Trust company contacted me being his attorney to provide who is right heir to his fortune and this according to them is their policy in sure circumstances.Directors of the company just adopted a resolution and I was mandated to provide his right heir for the release of the fund within a very limited time or forfeit the fund as an abandoned funds.your last name is similar making it easier.
It is unprofitable for his funds to be submitted to the government of this country or some financial institution.Like I said, I require solemn confidentiality on this. Please get in touch with me by my alternative email (hammwrkrichard@hotmail.com) 44-701 113 9692 for better confidentiality and send to me your telephone and fax numbers to enable us discuss further on this transaction. Thanks for your understanding.
Richard Hamm.
solicitor at law.
44-701 113 9692
hammwrkrichard@hotmail.com
What? A “solicitor at law” is using a hotmail account? This was my first tip off that this was an unprofessional email.
I mean, come on. Who would use a free email account for such “private” information? Surely an attorney would know better. Or would he?
Here’s another email I received just today that had me even more puzzled. This is what appears to be an official type email directed to me, and again the user is using AOL. I know there is a paid version of AOL as well, heck I used to pay the 20 or 25 bucks a month for AOL when they first started – but I know better now. When you get your own website, you can easily create your own private email addresses which give you a more professional look IMO (IMO means “In my opinion” which by the way my opinions are covered I believe by the first amendment 
.
Without further adeau here is that letter:
THE PEABODY LAW FIRM
620 Newport Centre Drive, Ste 1100
Newport Beach, California 92660
E-Mail: peabodylaw@aol.com
Telephone:(949) 200-4610
Facsimile:(949)200-4611
May 29, 2009
Ms. Jill Carpenter
Groton, Massachusetts
Re: Blog: First Request for Address to Effect Service of Process: Demand to Cease and Desist:
Dear Ms. Carpenter:
This office represents the interests of Heidi Diaz and Kimkins. In light of the contents of your recent blogs and web pages, it is apparent that you are familiar with my client(s) as well. My office is preparing litigation which involves your recent willful conduct and activities aimed at harming or interfering with my client and my client’s ongoing business interests.
As such, demand is hereby made that you immediately cease and desist from making any further derogatory or untoward comments on your blog(s) regarding my client and her business interests. In the event you fail to comply with this demand immediately, my client has instructed my office to vigorously pursue all avenues of relief for her damages via a court of appropriate jurisdiction. I further request that you provide your address or an address of your legal counsel authorized to accept service of legal process on your behalf.
In the event you fail to do so, I will promptly issue a subpoena to obtain your personal information from your internet provider.
Please feel free to contact me at your convenience to discuss this matter or in the event you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
THE LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY P. PEABODY, ESQ.
By:
Timothy P. Peabody, Esq.
Attorney for: HEIDI DIAZ dba KIMKINS
kks/TPP
cc: Client File
What is up with an aol email? And even more puzzling and unprofessional, what if I told you this email was not sent to my personal direct email address from the initial sender? It was sent to another party who forwarded it to me! How messed up is that?
Mr. Peabody may as well have just posted it in the comments area here on my blog. Since it had already been shared with another party, there is obviously no reason for me to hide it. Apparently Mr. Peabody didn’t think it was anything to really keep private, so why should I?
Let’s address the rest of this letter while I’m at it. Hold on while I pour myself a drink.
Yum. Ok.
Dear Ms. Carpenter:
Yes, that would be me.
This office represents the interests of Heidi Diaz and Kimkins.
Why? Er I mean, you poor thing. I guess someone has to though. Honestly, I’m happy my good tax dollars are not going to pay for that defense. So thank you Mr. Peabody for offering to take her money and defend her – which by the way if you didn’t know, some of that money she is paying you was probably generated by myself during the time of the Womans World promotion. So in effect my past efforts have been paying you in a round about way. Just think, there wouldn’t be funds to pay you if it weren’t for the marketing efforts of myself and some other affiliates.
In light of the contents of your recent blogs and web pages, it is apparent that you are familiar with my client(s) as well.
You could say I’m a tad bit familiar with the case. Yes, I may have invested a year or so doing my best to help uncover FRAUD. That is what a good citizen does. Not just uncovering the fraud, but making sure others are well aware of it. IMO.
My office is preparing litigation which involves your recent willful conduct and activities aimed at harming or interfering with my client and my client’s ongoing business interests.
Oh! Exciting! An Investigation of some sort? You will need to investigate to prepare for your litigation I’m guessing? Will Kojak and Jessica Lansbury be there? How about that other guy with the trench coat – you know, oh gosh, I forgot his name. Perhaps my commenters will remind me. It’s on the tip of my tongue with some vodka right now so please forgive me.
“willful conduct and activities aimed at harming or interfering with my client and my client’s ongoing business interests.”
Now just hold on a minute there Mr. Peabody – you got it all wrong. My goal here at this blog is to expose online scams. If your client has done nothing wrong then honestly she has nothing to fear. What can little old me do here in Groton Mass? ROFLMBO Ok, I just had to look it up and it does appear that such a place exists. I can tell you with all honesty on both of my grandmothers graves I have not lived there and that is not where I am. But thank you for letting me discover a new place on google maps.
“my client’s ongoing business interests.“
Sorry, but I just had to break that up a bit more. Now Mr. Peabody, how the heck would I know what your clients ongoing business interests are? I don’t live in her house. I don’t even live in the same state. Geeze, if I had that information I would be one powerful person. I guess I’m flattered at the credit you give me.
As such, demand is hereby made that you immediately cease and desist from making any further derogatory or untoward comments on your blog(s) regarding my client and her business interests.
Hmm. So if I say Heidi Diaz did not lose 198 lbs in 11 months and was not the woman in the lawn chair, nor the woman in the red dress, I should be ok, right? But I don’t get why what you’re alluding to is that I can not say something like “she is also the founder of simplechoicesdiet.com” because that might be a business interest? That information is public knowledge. Why am I not allowed to say something like that? Is she wanting to keep that information private for some reason? Because honestly she didn’t do a very good job of it. That information practically landed in my lap – like she was flaunting it. Yes, I can’t tell you how right now for obvious reasons – but that information is avalable all over the web. Heidi Diaz owns simple choices diet, Heidi Diaz owns simple choices diet, Heidi Diaz owns simple choices diet. There. I said it. Big Whoop.
In the event you fail to comply with this demand immediately, my client has instructed my office to vigorously pursue all avenues of relief for her damages via a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Damages? What? What about my hair falling out? What about my business going down the toilet for promoting a diet where she gave me materials to promote with that she had no right to be sharing – IE Russian bride pictures on banners? What about her false story that she told me I could use – along with anything on the Kimkins site to promote her diet? You want to talk damages? What about the mental anguish I faced when realizing I was promoting a diet that was based on fraud? That I believed that woman had lost weight and kept it off, only to find out it was all a lie? Do you have any clue about my damages? I have been VERY kind to not even address them in full at this time, but if you think I am going to sit here and take your threatening letter, you’d better think again.
I further request that you provide your address or an address of your legal counsel authorized to accept service of legal process on your behalf.
Request all you want Mr. Peabody. Perhaps I will request to get your computer and email correspondence as for all I know you sent this email to a thousand people. An email that should have been sent directly to me as a private and confidential matter. That you sir had knowledge of my websites, and could have simply sent me an email though the proper channels, but chose to send it to a random person who now knows about this.
In the event you fail to do so, I will promptly issue a subpoena to obtain your personal information from your internet provider.
I’ll tell you what. You give me your information, and I’ll give you mine. Maybe.
Please feel free to contact me at your convenience to discuss this matter or in the event you have any questions or comments.
Here’s a tip to you Mr. Peabody – if that is your real name. Get yourself a real email address to reply to other than that AOL thing you put on your letter. That just doesn’t cut it for me – as you can see from the first scam mail at the top of this post.
Share this Post[?]
Quacks Get Their Quash! Kimkins Won’t be Slapping Us
I have to agree with Prudentia, it is a wonderful day in the neighborhood.
All seven of our motions to quash were granted today. Heidi lost. Heidi’s new attorney showed up today and tried to get the court to continue the matter but the judge emphatically denied that request. The court decided to hear all 7 since Mr. Peabody showed up.
The frivilous SLAPP suit has been dropped on what I currently understand is the lack of jurisdiction. I myself live far from Corona and would have been greatly inconvenienced to drop everything and go – so I would like to thank the Seven Lucky Ducks who were able to provide John Tiedt with the necessary means to bring this silly suit to an end quickly.
And thank you John! Now we can spend our precious time on more serious matters like our Class Action Lawsuit.
Share this Post[?] Smoke This
-
-
-
-
-
Sign by Dealighted - Coupons and Deals
Sign by Dealighted - Coupons and DealsDid you visit while I was away?
From Dec 07' to March 08'
Blog Catalog
